ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
Description
Have you tried full view? It is very recommended!
License
2014 © by Martin Ramsner
Similar Images
If you like my pictures follow me on my Facebook page Martin's art of photography, my website "Martin's art of photography" or on any other one of my social sites (See my deviantART profile for details) - THANK's a lot!
License
2014 © by Martin Ramsner
Synopsis
Out of the set "Shoot the photographer" a new composing with a strong relation to nature.
Processing
Adobe Photoshop, google+ Nik Filter
Model
Model 'Gertraud Schnabel’ by Martin’s art of photograph; Facebook fanpage, Website
Used Stock references
The following stock material have been used for the creation. The copyright remains with the respective owners. For the usage please respect their terms and conditions. Thanks to all for the great stock material!
Out of the set "Shoot the photographer" a new composing with a strong relation to nature.
Processing
Adobe Photoshop, google+ Nik Filter
Model
Model 'Gertraud Schnabel’ by Martin’s art of photograph; Facebook fanpage, Website
Used Stock references
The following stock material have been used for the creation. The copyright remains with the respective owners. For the usage please respect their terms and conditions. Thanks to all for the great stock material!
- Birds by Gertraud Facebook fanpage
- Sky/Clouds 'Fan Clouds' by CAStock
- Texture 'A Dozen Starfields and Apo 7X Flames' by dmaland
- Landscape 'Field 15‘by FrantisekSpurny
- Rain Drops 'Rain 3‘by joannastar-stock
- Mountains 'Snow Mountain PNG‘by AbsurdWordPreferred
Similar Images
You want to see more?
Check out my picture set (related to this picture) on deviantART: compositions and art gallery
Looking for more?
Check out my picture set (related to this picture) on deviantART: compositions and art gallery
Looking for more?
Image size
2048x1536px 2.88 MB
© 2014 - 2024 ramsnerart
Comments3
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
artofphotograhy requested a critique, and while I can't actually write a "real" critique because of my non-premium status, I can still say a few things.
Basically, there's a lot to like here, and very little to quibble about. The main problem that the artist solved was sticking everything together in a way that seems unified. There's a fair bit of art in this kind of "class" that looks cartoony, forced, or just "not right." This piece avoids those problems. There's a also a nice feeling of action, conveyed through the blur on the birds and the implied motion of the model's hair. This is notable because of how "square" the picture is - the only strong diagonals are the clouds, and they're only diagonal because of the vanishing point. So - nice work on avoiding "stiffness."
One might raise a point of argument about the compositing of the model's hair. From a technical perspective, I suppose that it could be picked at for being just a tiny bit muddy...just that little touch of "not quite defined enough." However, as I've said in regards to other pieces with a range of issues that bothered other folks: "Who cares about real and perfect when the whole thing is fun to look at?"
In my opinion, this picture is nicely executed, and I'm glad that a piece of my stock made a contribution, however minor, to the way it turned out.
Basically, there's a lot to like here, and very little to quibble about. The main problem that the artist solved was sticking everything together in a way that seems unified. There's a fair bit of art in this kind of "class" that looks cartoony, forced, or just "not right." This piece avoids those problems. There's a also a nice feeling of action, conveyed through the blur on the birds and the implied motion of the model's hair. This is notable because of how "square" the picture is - the only strong diagonals are the clouds, and they're only diagonal because of the vanishing point. So - nice work on avoiding "stiffness."
One might raise a point of argument about the compositing of the model's hair. From a technical perspective, I suppose that it could be picked at for being just a tiny bit muddy...just that little touch of "not quite defined enough." However, as I've said in regards to other pieces with a range of issues that bothered other folks: "Who cares about real and perfect when the whole thing is fun to look at?"
In my opinion, this picture is nicely executed, and I'm glad that a piece of my stock made a contribution, however minor, to the way it turned out.